<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/</link>
	<description>Down-To-Earth Advice For Bloggers and Internet Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:09:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>The idea of providing a link between the different IM&#039;s is cool.  I can&#039;t be bothered signing up for them all so I just have Skype and now, GTalk.  With this type of product, network effects are paramount.   As Alborz said, if there are no other users, no one wants to use it.  But if they can cross platform, that problem would be solved.  Then it would be a very risky proposition indeed for one of the providers (e.g. Micro$oft) not to play nice because they could soon find themselves on the wrong end of the equation if it were Everyone Else vs Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of providing a link between the different IM&#8217;s is cool.  I can&#8217;t be bothered signing up for them all so I just have Skype and now, GTalk.  With this type of product, network effects are paramount.   As Alborz said, if there are no other users, no one wants to use it.  But if they can cross platform, that problem would be solved.  Then it would be a very risky proposition indeed for one of the providers (e.g. Micro$oft) not to play nice because they could soon find themselves on the wrong end of the equation if it were Everyone Else vs Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Alborz Fallah</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Alborz Fallah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>Hmm I downloaded it yesterday and had a play around. It doesn&#039;t look very fancy, which I guess is good, but I stared at it for a while.. realized no one else I know uses it, and went back to MSN.

We don&#039;t really need another IM do we? Google is just trying to fill a gap in its line up, but about 5 years or so too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I downloaded it yesterday and had a play around. It doesn&#8217;t look very fancy, which I guess is good, but I stared at it for a while.. realized no one else I know uses it, and went back to MSN.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t really need another IM do we? Google is just trying to fill a gap in its line up, but about 5 years or so too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallbusinessbranding - Small Business Branding Strategies and Ideas for Savvy Solopreneurs</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>smallbusinessbranding - Small Business Branding Strategies and Ideas for Savvy Solopreneurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 03:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Talk Up&lt;/strong&gt;

Got this from Yaro (thanks for the graphic Yaro) ... Google Talk is up and running, and it looks pretty cool. It&#039;s not good enough (yet) to give Skype a run for it&#039;s money, but it has a lot of potential along with 4 billion dollars to realize that po...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Talk Up</strong></p>
<p>Got this from Yaro (thanks for the graphic Yaro) &#8230; Google Talk is up and running, and it looks pretty cool. It&#8217;s not good enough (yet) to give Skype a run for it&#8217;s money, but it has a lot of potential along with 4 billion dollars to realize that po&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlusOne Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>PlusOne Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Update - this from Aust ABC news

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1445835.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update &#8211; this from Aust ABC news</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1445835.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1445835.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>I agree PlusOne. The IM client is very plain and boring, they haven&#039;t done anything to beat other IM clients. I can see this client being used by Google Fanboys only :) Pretty much me !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree PlusOne. The IM client is very plain and boring, they haven&#8217;t done anything to beat other IM clients. I can see this client being used by Google Fanboys only <img src='http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Pretty much me !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlusOne Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>PlusOne Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>I guess the difference between skype and Gtalk is that skype is competing in the telephony area - with Skype in andSkypeOut (not that skypeout provides good enough sound for business computer-&gt;landline calls). Lets face it - voip is commonplace, from the crappy viopbuster that claims free computer to landline calls (don&#039;t waste your time with it sound is shocking) to voice via MSN instant messenger (yahoo as well), plus I seem to remember that Microsoft IM has voice as well.

All Google is doing is playing catchup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the difference between skype and Gtalk is that skype is competing in the telephony area &#8211; with Skype in andSkypeOut (not that skypeout provides good enough sound for business computer-&gt;landline calls). Lets face it &#8211; voip is commonplace, from the crappy viopbuster that claims free computer to landline calls (don&#8217;t waste your time with it sound is shocking) to voice via MSN instant messenger (yahoo as well), plus I seem to remember that Microsoft IM has voice as well.</p>
<p>All Google is doing is playing catchup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Can I just have a search engine that return awesome results? Argh!

That is one problem when a company goes public...they lose sight of their customers...after all when you are publicly traded you have a legal obligation to your shareholders to increase profits...regarless.

I just want a company that is so inovative that it can take just search and make that profiotable.

I hate google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just have a search engine that return awesome results? Argh!</p>
<p>That is one problem when a company goes public&#8230;they lose sight of their customers&#8230;after all when you are publicly traded you have a legal obligation to your shareholders to increase profits&#8230;regarless.</p>
<p>I just want a company that is so inovative that it can take just search and make that profiotable.</p>
<p>I hate google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Riches</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/240/google-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Riches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/240/google-talk/#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll pull it off! Competition is one of the best things a consumer can ask for, and with Google in the mix, it will surely cause huge rivalry in the internet cauldron! I&#039;m sure new features will be added here, new sounds there etc. but I can see Google keeping things functional, but simple, which I love. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll pull it off! Competition is one of the best things a consumer can ask for, and with Google in the mix, it will surely cause huge rivalry in the internet cauldron! I&#8217;m sure new features will be added here, new sounds there etc. but I can see Google keeping things functional, but simple, which I love. <img src='http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
