<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sued for Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/243/google-sued-for-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/243/google-sued-for-porn/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arines</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/243/google-sued-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-54024</link>
		<dc:creator>arines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/243/google-sued-for-porn/#comment-54024</guid>
		<description>yeah, I think copyscape have a great tool to detect copycat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I think copyscape have a great tool to detect copycat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Results</title>
		<link>http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/243/google-sued-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candy.become-a-blogger.com/243/google-sued-for-porn/#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certainly no legal eagle, but surely Google is 100% safe here?  If this ever went to court, wouldn&#039;t Google argue that it is merely a &quot;venue&quot; for information transfer and that it isn&#039;t liable for the content and conduct of sites indexed by Google?

On the subject of copywright, I found this mega-cool resource today: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyscape.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Find out who&#039;s stealing your website content!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly no legal eagle, but surely Google is 100% safe here?  If this ever went to court, wouldn&#8217;t Google argue that it is merely a &#8220;venue&#8221; for information transfer and that it isn&#8217;t liable for the content and conduct of sites indexed by Google?</p>
<p>On the subject of copywright, I found this mega-cool resource today: <a href="http://www.copyscape.com/" rel="nofollow">Find out who&#8217;s stealing your website content!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

