Yes, it is only a way of speeding up the process but then it was never sold as anything else. At least it’s not bloatware like one or two recent releases that do a similar job.

As for OnlyWire, forget it, it’s seriously bust. SocialMarker.com does a much better job.

I just read this review – a bit late I suppose – but I guess I agree to Fred – Why pay $47 if you can get it from site like socialmarker.com? The services looks all the same to me.

My two coins

Like Fran, I have already run into login issues while doing the prep work for using the tool. A bit disappointing to start with, I have to say. The main selling point of the product seems to be time reduction in submission of your content. We all know that dealing with software problems can take up valuable time. I will continue my evaluation of the product and see if it gets any better.

I will be including a complete review of my experience with Web2Submitter at my web site over the next few weeks (if anyone’s interested). I hope my testimony will be similar to those testimonies given on the Web2Submitter sales page.

Thank you

Your post seemed fine while you were stating it was “about me” (you) but it left the path when you added that your way is how it “should be.”

It exemplifies, yet again, the kind of disconnect that exists between A-list bloggers, their supporters and then the bulk of the work from home crowd.

There’s some horrific assumption that just because you can see the benefit of something and state it with academic and logical precision, that the viewing audience can comprehend it, too.

The fact is that the blogosphere is a LOT different than when guys like Yaro and others, who shall remain unnamed, made it yet they’re still giving out the same advice with millions of new blogs and bloggers in the ring.

If someone wants a quick boost, wants to meet some like-minded people (in the buzz group), and can spare less than one month’s cost of what Yaro charges for his membership, Web2Submitter is just fine.

And if they aren’t satisfied, guess what? They get a refund as per Clickbank’s policy. How can you not, at least, present this kind of information to people as an option – especially knowing that so many of them are not like you or Yaro but are actually beleaguered and tired of being over-estimated.

Sam

For me the $47 isn’t worth it. My strategy is to build readers now, then work on getting the quality so high THEY submit for me . . . that’s how it should be anyway. In the meantime, OnlyWire is good enough.

While I don’t sell Web2Submitter, I have a special affinity for it because I understand what they’re trying to do.

They’re trying to put a little bit of power into the hands of masses… not too much power, but some. The Buzz Group aces isn’t a tipping point, it’s an avalanche… to have that kind of support, though bookmarking sites really don’t approve of it, is like gold.

Think of how much crap people have wasted over $4700 on and here’s a simple $47 product that can help those without much traffic to have a bigger shot playing the numbers game.

Compared to what you get for traffic, it might not mean all that much, but compared to what the majority of your visitors get for traffic, a blog post in dozens of social bookmarking sites, in the same amount of time it would take to hand post to a fraction of them, can lead to that extra 2-3 loyal readers… which then gives us access to their network of friends.

Each new loyal reader comes with friends. Anything that’s under $50 that helps semi-automate one’s reach into social sites should be bought without hesitation… especially when it comes with a support group mail list and an iron clad money back guarantee.

Sam

great objective review. thanks Yaro and Fran. So I guess the same could be said for any automated submitter software. I downloaded roboform, haven’t tried it, but I guess it is a similar but more generic tool.

seems to me $47 is worth the buzz group alone, as long as that group has some quality standards, it could work well.